ADF Structure, Customs, and Policy

Passed on October 15, 2014.  Reviewed by Rev. Kathleen

ADF Structure, Customs, and Policy 
Laura Fuller (Snow)

1)   Explain why public, inclusive ritual is important to ADF. (200 words min.)


There are several reasons why it is important to have open, public, inclusive rituals.

First, ADF from its inception was intended to look like a mainstream church and give lay-members the same sort of experiences that they would be able to get from a mainstream church.  This is an important step in making neopaganism in general and Druidry in particular an accepted religion in our society (1, 2).  One of the expectations of a mainstream church is that it would have regular and public rituals for members and those curious in membership to attend.  With that as a guiding principle and hope for the future, other reasons come into play (3).

Second, having open, public rituals gives solitaries and the curious a chance to experience a ritual.  This is important to give the former a sense of community and the latter a taste of what we are about in the hopes of growing the community and the organization.  An open ritual might be a solitary’s only chance to engage in and practice an ADF Core Order Ritual.  It is a chance for training to occur for those who do not have a grove or cannot attend regular grove functions (4). 

Third, paleopagans participated in community rituals.  For them, community was important and paleoDruids were the leaders of the religious life of the community.  If we as an organization are serious about recreating the traditions of the past, then we must offer open and public rituals as scholarly evidence supports that druids engaged in such (1,2).

2)   Describe the duties and function of clergy in ADF. (100 words min.)


Clergy play several roles in ADF.  First, they are the leaders of the organization.  They do this by “[formulating] and [articulating]” (CC Bylaws) both the theology (beliefs) and liturgy (practices) of ADF.  What I take this to mean is that they both create (formulate) these important functions of a church and explain (articulate) it to the lay members of the organization.  This makes them responsible for the vision of the organization as well as demanding that they be good at not just communicating, but teaching.

As if this isn’t a daunting enough task on its own, the clergy must also act as spiritual advisors to the members of the organization, providing them with support and counseling when they face difficult decisions of a religious or spiritual nature.  While both of these skill sets are generally expected of religious leaders in other religions, these skills (lead, teach, and counsel) are not necessarily practiced with the same ease by all members of the clergy, and so while they must provide these skills to the laity, they must also be able to provide them to teach other.

Further, ADF clergy act as advisors and leaders of the various smaller groups (SIGs, Orders, etc) within ADF and having a clergy member is required to become a fully chartered grove.

Specific responsibilities of the Clergy Council as assigned by the organization include the following:
  1. Determine ordination standards for ADF Clergy.  This allows members and the public to be assured that ADF Clergy credentialing is a real and meaningful process and that if someone is ordained, that they have the skills desired to represent ADF as a Priest.
  2. Maintain a training program for ADF Clergy.  This allows clergy to fulfil on the promises above.
    1. Subject to requirements of ADF study programs determined by the CoL.
  3. Determine ADF liturgical standards.  Maintain standards for ritual practice for the orthopraxy of ADF.
    1. Evaluate requests to vary from such standards by subgroups.  In cases where subgroups wish to change the format of a ritual, determine if it is appropriate and still keeps the spirit of ADF practice.
  4. Represent ADF Druidry in theological matters outside ADF.  Act as Ambassador to other groups, both mainstream and not.
  5. Research, write, and publish works based on ADF Druidry.  Increase the body of available scholarship for those seeking help on the path.
  6. Maintain a prison ministry for incarcerated ADF members.  This requires working with both the ADF system and the various systems of the county/state/and federal levels to be sure that prisoners are able to practice as is their right without causing undue burden or harm to other inmates.
    1. Train, authorize, and supervise all ADF prisoner ministers.
    2. Define and administer groups within a prison environment to fulfill the spiritual needs of incarcerated members. Said groups shall not be referred to as 'Groves' or in any way present themselves as representing ADF as a whole.
  7. Govern all ADF Orders.  All ADF Orders must be headed by an ADF Clergy member. (5)


3)   Explain why ADF has an Indo-European focus, and why we use the term "Druid" in our name. (200 words min.)


ADF has a pan-Indo-European focus because having such a broad base allows us to use various forms of comparative studies in our recreation of what ancient paleo-pagans held as their beliefs and practices.  Understanding that many of the practices and beliefs go back before the Indo-Europeans began their migrations lets us also weed out (or at least acknowledge) which beliefs grew as a response to local pressures.  Those local pressures could have been from indigenous people already living in the locations the Indo-European peoples were moving into, or could have been from local spirits/deities.  Regardless, focusing on the common structures of all IE cultures allows us to use that lens in creating our modern druidry (6).

The best I could reason about why we use the word druid in our name is because our founder came to create this organization out of his experiences with the Reformed Druids of North America and his frustrations with them and their denial of what they were doing as a pagan religious experience.  Because that was his background, it made sense for him to use that as the title, even if we are embracing a pan-IE model of spirituality and religion.  In his interview in Hopman’s Being a Pagan(1), Bonewits talks about these early experiences, but he also talks about how the core group of founders were drawn from Wicca and Asatru, giving them both magic and a tribal structure.  Additionally, he talks about how many of the practices of the ancient priestly PIE class survived until this past century behind the Iron Curtain in the former USSR.  Even with this broad base of adherents, when looking at the past, Bonewits states in his article Indo-European Paleopaganism and Its Clergy that “only the western Celtic clergy (the Druids) seem to have had any sort of organized inter-tribal communications network. Most of the rest of the IE clergy seem to have kept to their own local tribes. Among the Germanic peoples, the priestly class had weakened by the early centuries of the Common Era to the point where the majority of ritual work was done by the heads of households.”  This, when combined with his own background, makes for a logical choice as Druid as a title for a member of an organization that was and is to be a model for public paganism as a mainstream religion.  Fox sums this up by saying that we call ourselves druids because the ancient druids were the priestly class who valued excellence in all things, and we wish to emulate them by doing the same (7).  Why not Excellence?

4)   Describe the Guilds, SIGS, and Kins of ADF in general, their function within the organization, and the goal of the Guild, SIG, and Kin systems. (150 words min. for each type of subgroup)


Guilds: Guilds are subgroups formed to promote “study, learning, and training in a particular focus area” (5). 

The guilds offer a framework of learning and support.  Not necessarily for learning the basic skills, but rather for learning to use them in the context of community and worship.  They serve as a place to engage in conversations about the arts and the place of those arts in ADF and how those arts can serve as a conduit to the divine.  They also offer a framework for recognition of one’s learning and efforts in an art form and a way to track progress and willingness to share one’s gifts with the greater community.

Guilds have two leaders.  The Chief is responsible for reporting on activities of the Guild to the Council of Lore.  They also represent the Guild with the Council of Lore.  The Preceptor also represents the guild with the Council of Lore.  They are responsible for all Guild training activities. (5)

SIGs: SIGs, or Special Interest Groups, are places for those who share an interest in a common topic to engage in discussions and learning around it when that interest does not fall within the scope of one of the other subgroups (5).  Some of the SIGs are subgroups of a broader hearth culture, such as the SIG interested in the Morrighan.  Some focus on lifestyle choices, such as being a parent or in a poly relationship.  Regardless of their focus, SIGs offer members a place to discuss how their identification with a specific minority group (be that gay, in the military, or choice of deity) impacts their lives and their relationship with druidry.  They offer a chance for members to network around these issues as well, sharing what works for them in their practices.  Finally, SIGs give back to ADF by helping to define what areas we as an organization need to spend time on.  If there are a lot of people interested in one of these Special Interest groups, clearly it is something the organization as a whole should at least consider in the broader picture.  The SIGs help to provide ADF with some understanding of what topics are important to the membership and what tools need to be made available or created to support the needs of the group.

A SIG is led by an organizer who can be anyone who is a member of ADF.  They can be removed by a majority vote of the SIG, and elected the same way.  They are responsible for submitting quarterly reports to the Council of Lore (5).

Kins: Kins are groups within ADF where those that wish to align their practices with a certain hearth culture can share ideas about their experiences working with specific Indo-European pantheons.  Currently, there are eight Kin Groups.  One of the many functions of the kin groups is to develop resources and provide information to those who are beginning to build a relationship with the kindreds as practiced by a particular culture.  They are an invaluable resource to new and old members alike because the insights and relationships to the various world-views expressed in the Indo-European Diaspora can vary greatly between cultures.  Whether it’s discussion about language, kindreds, or ritual practices, the Kins are a place to turn for aid in building a ritual or a practice that is meaningful to the member.  The goal of the kin system is to further research in the various traditions that make up ADF and make them accessible to the members at large.

Kin leaders are elected and removed as specified by the by-laws of the Kin.  Kin Charters are governed by the Council of Lore (5).

5)   Describe ADF's official ceremonial calendar, and discuss why it was designed in this way. (200 words min.)


The official ceremonial calendar follows a solar calendar, with our high days set as the longest day (summer solstice), shortest day (winter solstice), the two days in the year when day and night are of equal length (spring and fall equinox), and the four points half way between these, much as one would find on a compass rose.

While we won’t try and perpetuate the myth that druids built Stonehenge, we do recognize that a number of ritual practices had to do with measuring the length of the days.  As a keeper of knowledge, this would be part of the tasks of the paleo-pagan clergy.

As for why it was designed in this way, I believe this is two-fold.  First, many of those coming to ADF are coming from other pagan pathways.  Designing the calendar this was is both familiar, as the dates correspond to religious holidays in most of the IE cultures as well as in Wicca, as well as practical for an organization that wishes to bring into the fold multiple cultures.  Which I believe is the second reason this calendar makes sense.  By choosing holy dates based on solar occurrences rather than on ‘traditional holidays’ of one of the many groups represented, it does not privilege any one particular IE cultural tradition.  Not all cultures had a festival for all of these dates, but by using this calendar, we have something close for most of the cultures, and individuals or groups within ADF can pick and chose which traditional practices work best for them.

Groves are responsible to hold public rituals for each of these high days, however they are given some leniency on the date the ritual occurs, so long as it is within a week on either side of the actual date.   The Calendar and the requirements for grove rituals are laid out in the ADF Constitution, Section 4. (8)

6)   Compare Isaac's original "Law, Policy, Tradition, and Customs in ADF" article with how you see ADF today. Describe what is still true and what is no longer accurate in that document. (300 words min.)


It is always interesting to read a historical document and see whether the visions and hopes for the future came into fruition.  That is especially true when the vast majority seems to have held up to the test of time.

It seems that most of the points he illustrates have remained the same through the years.  The things that were forbidden are still forbidden.  The laws have apparently remained consistent.  From what I have seen, the policies section is also unchanged, although I have not seen or heard mention of the ‘Good Neighbor Policy’ in the currently Handbooks and doing a search on the site only gave me this article.  Therefore, I assume it’s no longer in affect.  I believe I’d heard something about a policy that used to be in place regarding a minimum distance between Groves, and this seems a likely candidate for what this policy is referring to.  However, I was told that policy is no longer in place.  I would be unsurprised if there are changes to policies regarding Tax Status, but that would more than likely be due to changes from the IRS rather than from ADF.

One change I did note was that this article mentions that a new Grove doesn’t have to start public ritual right away, but the Grove Organizer Handbook says differently (9).  I can only assume that was changed at some point so that Protogroves have that option, but if you are ready for a Charter to be a grove, then you need to be ready to offer ritual.

I have not seen much change in the traditions and customs.  If anything, this is the area that seems to have grown the most, which is likely what was intended given Isaac’s statements at the beginning of the article about this being a framework to allow for the growth of a healthy organization, and that a healthy organization has to have some flexibility to it so that people can make their groves and the organization their own. 

It seems that ADF has done a good job of remaining true to its founding principles while still allow the organization to grow and blossom.  With that in mind, there is hope that we will see the ultimate flowering of Isaac’s vision, a mainstream druidry!

7)   Describe ADF's utilization of Dumezil's "tripartition" and its affect on ADF's structure, study programs, and the religion of ADF members in general. (200 words min.)


Tripartition is a concept created by French sociologist Dumezil (or at least, is much read in sociology) that theorized that society had three classes and each of these classes filled a specific and necessary function. 

The first class is the priestly/ruling class.  This class is the keepers of knowledge and the performers of ritual, both from a religious and a legal standpoint.  In fact, in many paleopagan cultures, religious and legal melded (6 Serith Chapter 2)).  Thus, the king was often the priest at celebrations that impacted the entire country or community and his advisors were priests who were the keepers of knowledge (21.  Bonewits 1984)

This is clearly evident in ADF’s structure.  Our leaders and our clergy are largely synonymous.  Our Advisors for our Orders must be Clergy (5)  The Subgroup Charter Manual, under the Clergy Council Section Point 4, subpoint 7 says that Clergy govern all ADF Orders.  While the Board of Directors do not have to be members of the Clergy Council according to the by-laws of ADF (they only have to be members) (10), the Archdruid Chairs the Clergy Council (5).  To date we have not had an Archdruid who was not also a member of the Clergy.  It is unclear whether that is possible, based on the conflicting messages of those two documents.  Technically, the by-laws outrank the Subgroup Charter, and neither specifically says that the Archdruid must already be a member of the Clergy, only that they will Chair the Clergy Council.

The second class was made up of the warriors.  Some also include merchants in this class.  They were the ones who brought wealth into the tribe and supported (or had a reciprocal relationship with) the king.

Though less obvious, this matches with memberships in the various guilds and orders.  The artists, bards, brewers, and other ‘skilled laborers’ who do work that supports the clergy in their ability to carry out the mission of the organization. 

The third function was the farmers/laborers/thralls.  They were the producers, rather than the defenders.  They were the largest part of society and also held the least power, yet without them, society would have collapsed for lack of food and raw materials.

The third function is filled by those who are general members, but less active in the community and the various programs available to them.

This is important to ADF because each of these classes developed different relationships with the gods, and often with different gods.  Priests and Kings were more likely to form relationships with gods concerned with the tribe as a whole, with law and knowledge, and with the other functions of kingship.  Warriors were more likely to worship a warrior god.  Farmers were more likely to pray to the land spirits, their ancestors who would be concerned with their continued well being, or to gods concerned with agriculture and weather. 

Because of this, we have significantly more information on the gods, practices, and beliefs of the kingly and priestly class.  They had power, and thus they were what were told about in stories.  The bards were of this class, and so were most concerned with their interests.  On the reverse, there is a lack of information outside of folk tales about the beliefs and practices of the common man (or woman). 

The second important point with Dumezil is that it’s not a perfect system.  For example, Thor was a god of both warriors because of his role in protecting Midgard from the frost giants, and a god of the common man because he protected the crops and fields as well.  Goddesses also are hard to fit in this tripartite system.  Still, understanding this system gives us a way of looking at IE cultures to make comparisons and to help us understand why some information might be lacking when it seems as if it should be available due to its importance to the majority of the people.

8)   Explain the difference between "orthopraxy" religions and "orthodoxy". Where do you feel ADF falls? (200 words min.)


An orthopraxic religion is one that has set standards of practice, of action.  An orthodox religion is one that has set standards of belief, usually in the form of a creed.  Religions or denominations of religions can be one, both, or neither.

I feel that ADF is fairly orthopraxic.  We have the Core Order of ritual, we have expectations of our Groves that they do community service, that they have meetings, that they have public rituals that follow our Core Order, all thirty-seven steps.  While other religions, such as the Catholic Church I grew up in, were further on the spectrum of orthopraxy than ADF, we do have certain expectations about what will happen when we hold a ritual. (11)

Isaac and others have discussed why this is.  Even the most liberal of mainstream religions have a certain level of orthopraxy so that members visiting from other locations feel comfortable.  There is regularness to having specific practices defined and performed the same way that is comforting to humans who on a core level are trying to mitigate the chaos in their lives (12). 

However, ADF is not as orthopraxic is other religions.  Again, using the Catholic Church as an example, no matter what parish you are in on a Sunday morning (or at any mass for that matter), you will hear the same readings.  They are dictated by Rome and every church will use the same ones.  The homily will be on a similar topic, also dictated.  Youth education will use the same resources no matter where you go.  This level of orthopraxy I hope we never see in ADF.  Part of the beauty of our organization is that members and groves are free to express themselves, their hearth cultures, and their beliefs in ways that are important to them.

Orthodoxy is having a set standard of belief.  While ADF does have some basic tenants of belief, defined most clearly in our cosmology, we are hardly a staunchly orthodox organization.  People are free to choose their own culture, their own patrons, or none.  They are not taught a creed to memorize, but rather given training to ask questions to learn.  This is healthy, because it encourages deep and meaningful relationships between each other and the kindreds. (13)

9)   Describe why we make Praise Offerings, how they are made, when they are made, and who they are made to. Be sure to describe this in both solitary practice and in two or more Groves' practices. (300 words min.)


Praise Offerings are offerings made to the various kindreds for the purpose of forming or strengthening relationships.  IE religions all have some concept of a gift for a gift, meaning that we give gifts either for blessings we have already received, or for blessings we hope to get in the future. (11, section on Ghosti)

Praise offerings can be made in many ways.  Intangible offerings can be performed at the altar or outside.  Physical gifts should be taken out of the human realm.  This can be done through fire if it’s something burnable, or through breaking it and burying the pieces.  Depending on the setting and what the offering is, it can just be left out or thrown into a stream or lake if there is a link between the recipient of the offering and some such location.  It’s important not to dispose of the offerings by throwing them in the trash, as they are not trash.  And care should be taken that if it’s left outside or on an inside altar that it isn’t something that will harm local wildlife or pets (tobacco or chocolate come to mind as favored offerings that can hurt animals).

Praise offerings are made during step 8 during a core order ritual.  Because of the relationship building aspect of offerings and its importance in all PIE cultures, this is the most important part of the ritual.  Outside of a ritual, they can be made as part of a daily devotional or, really, any time with proper preparation. (14)

Praise offerings are made to any entity we wish to strengthen bonds of relationship with.  This can be with the deities we worship, or with local nature spirits or the ancestors.  Usually during a core order ritual, the main offering is made to the deity of the occasion, although sometimes other guests may also receive an offering. (14)

Solitaries have an easier time of making offerings as they don’t have to coordinate others when trying to find the proper location for disposing of their offering.  On the other hand, it is the most important part of the rite and solitaries might find it hard to give it the proper gravitas when there is no one else adding to the offerings.  Providing a proper offering alone can also be difficult when seeking inspiration. (14)

In Whispering Lakes Grove’s Harvest Tide 2009 (15) Ritual, they specifically name that Praise Offerings may be brought forth for the Norns.  This makes it clear who is being offered to, to keep the confusion at bay, but also gives people a chance to make their offering if they desire.  The Norns were the Deity of the Occasion.  There is no mention in their writing if people spoke when making their offerings.

Sassafras Grove had people make their praise offerings in silence during their Samhain Rite, 2006.  (16).  Though the implication in the ritual text was that praise offerings were to be for the Deity of the Occasion, when made in silence, such things must be done on the honor system.

In Anthony Thomas’s Beltane Rite, like the rites I have personally attended to date, Praise offerings were made to all three Kindreds by whomever wished to make them.  (17). 

Groves might share the duty of who provides the offering or offerings, giving newer members a chance to participate and get a feel for a very important aspect of ritual.  In public ritual, however, there can be difficulties when people invoke deities who are not a planned part of the occasion (or even the pantheon the occasion is designed for!).  Another possible difficulty is the potential length of time for this section, giving everyone who wishes to make an offering a chance to do so.  It is difficult to plan in advance in a public offering, but it seems that multiple formats work and it is more a matter of making expectations clear in advance to keep the ritual running smoothly.


10)  Describe ADF's administrative structure. (150 words min.)


Administratively, ADF is a combination of congregational and episcopalian structural forms.  The national organization and its recognition and structured training programs are Episcopalian (3).  Decisions and credentialing is done by the Mother Grove.  Reports on all grove activities are sent to the Mother Grove.  Charters and tax paperwork is conducted through the Mother Grove.  All of this sets in place a structure of top down authority.

That said the groves themselves are left more or less alone to elect officers and make decisions about what they will do to fulfill the requirements placed on them by the mother grove.  For example, we are required to do community service, but the form that takes is left up to us.  We are required to hold high day rituals, but the deities of the occasion, the hearth culture, none of that is dictated to us.  Further, members directly elect all of our officers both in the grove and for the national organization, making it congregational in nature and giving it flexibility and responsiveness to the needs of the membership that is lacking in most top down organizations in general, but especially in religious ones (3).

ADF is directed by the Board of Directors, like any non-profit, although internally we refer to them as the Mother Grove.  The Mother Grove is made up of the Archdruid (the President), the Vice Archdruid (The Vice President), the Scribe (Secretary), the Member’s Advocate (Ombudsman), the Chief of the Council of Regional Druids (Regional Druids are representatives of multi-state regions), and the Chief of the Council of Senior Druids (Senior Druids being the Presidents of Groves).    There are also four non-officer members of the board.  The board meets once a quarter.  Each director has a vote, excepting the Member’s Advocate, and two-thirds are required for a quorum (18).  Groves have a representative in the form of the Chief of the Council of Senior Druids, however Solitaries do not have an official vote on the board.  Solitaries do, however, have a SIG, or Special Interest Group (19).  As a SIG, they file reports to the Council of Lore, which is chaired by the Preceptor (5) which is also not a voting position on the board.  That leaves them to contact their regional druid, and request their help in going through the Chief of the Council of Regional Druids if they feel they have something that needs to be discussed by the board.

In addition to the Board, there are three other officers.  The Pursewarden (Treasurer), the Preceptor (in charge of Study Programs), and an Administrator.  All are appointed by the Board of Directors (20). 





Works Cited

1) Hopman, Ellen E and Lawrence Bond.  Being a Pagan: Druids, Wiccans, and Witches Today.  1994.  Isaac Bonewits interview.

2) Bonewits, Isaac.  The Vision of ADF.  https://www.adf.org/about/basics/vision.html

3) Gold, Peter.  1997.  What I Expect From My Church.  https://www.adf.org/articles/identity/expect.html

4) Gold, Peter.  The Necessity On Doing Public Ritual.  https://www.adf.org/articles/identity/pubrit.html


6) Serith, Ceisiwr.  Deep Ancestors: Practicing the Religion of the Proto-Indo-Europeans.  2007.

7) Adelmann, John “Fox”.  Neopagan Druidism Today: Concepts and Organization  https://www.adf.org/about/basics/npd-today.html


9) Grove Organizer’s Handbook Section on Required Activities For Your Group https://www.adf.org/members/groves/starting/goh/required-activities.html


11) Dangler, Michael.  Nine Central Tenets of Druidic Ritual. https://www.adf.org/articles/cosmology/nine-tenets.html

12) Bonewits, Isaac.  Is ADF Dogmatic? https://www.adf.org/articles/identity/is-adf-dogmatic.html

13) Wyndham, Jeffrey.  Core Ideas In Druid Theology.  https://www.adf.org/articles/identity/core-theology.html




17) Thompson, Anthony.  Beltane Rite, 2006.  Irish-Celtic.  https://www.adf.org/system/files/members/guilds/liturgists/yearbooks/2006/Beltane2006.pdf

18) ADF Bylaws, subsection on the Board of Directors. https://www.adf.org/about/org/bylaws.html#article_5

19) Solitaries Special Interest Group.  https://www.adf.org/members/sigs/solitaries/index.html

20) ADF Bylaws, Section on Non-Director Officers.  https://www.adf.org/about/org/bylaws.html#article_7

21) Bonewits, Issac.  Indo-European Paleopaganism and Its Clergy.  1984, Druid’s Progress 1.
https://www.adf.org/articles/identity/ieclergy.html



No comments:

Post a Comment