Indo-European Mythology 1

Passed February 28, 2015 Reviewed By Amber Cannon

Laura Fuller (Snow)
IE Myth 1

  1. List and discuss the major primary sources for the mythology of three Indo-European cultures, including their dates of origin and authorship (if known). Discuss any important factors that may cause problems in interpreting these sources, such as the existence of multiple revisions, or the presence of Christian or other outside influences in surviving texts. (minimum 300 words)

Norse: The major source for Norse myth is the Codex Regius, or the Royal Book.  It is thought to have been written in approximately 1270.  Written on 45 vellum leaves, it contains what we today call the Poetic Edda and contains 32 poems for which it is the only written source.  Originally there were eight additional leaves, which are now missing.  It was discovered by  Brynjólfur Sveinsson, then Bishop of Skálholt, who sent it as a present to King Frederick III of Denmark in 1662, which is when it was given the name Royal Book (Codex Regius no. 2365).   Though it was lost for approximately four centuries, clearly the work it contained was familiar to at least the educated among the Icelanders as many of the stories in it are woven into the Prose (sometimes called Younger or Snorri’s) Edda.  Written by Snorri Sturluson in about 1220 CE, the Prose Edda, along with the Poetic Edda, compromise the bulk of surviving Scandinavian mythology (Sturluson).   While Heathens recognize the debt we owe Snorri in his weaving of the tales and his work in preserving the kennings and other forms of skaldic poetry, one of the major critiques of the Edda is that it was clearly Christianized, leaving some ambiguity as to what was actually believed in some cases, and how much was given a Christian gloss.  For example, in his Prose Edda and Heimskringla, Snorri uses euphemism to suggest that the gods were in fact Trojan heroes who traveled north and settled and started dynasties in Scandinavia in order to make the mythology mesh with an acceptable political and religious view at the time (Puhvel).

Greek: The primary sources comes from Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey, written around the 8th century BCE, and Hesiod’s Theogony written between the 8th – 7th century BCE though the stories themselves seem to date from around 1200 BCE (Stewart).  During the four or so centuries between when the stories entered into the Greek consciousness to when they were written down, there were obviously numerous revisions and adaptations.  These adaptations came in three forms.  Some were the normal changes to Indo-European myth that one would expect as a culture matures.  Puhvel calls these superstratal (Indo-European Greek).  Additionally in the case of Greece, though, we see a significant amount of substratal influence from the Aegean, Pelasgian, and Minoan cultures already in the area before the Greeks settled there.  This is most evident in the relationship to the myth of Zeus’s birth and subsequent rearing in order to free his siblings from their residence in Kronos’s belly.   In addition to these two sets of influence, Greece was also both on the seacoast and at a cross roads of civilization and so we see a significant amount of adstratal influence in the constant contact and cultural seepage from Asia Minor and parts further east (Puhvel 127).

Slavic/Baltic:  In Comparative Mythology, Puhvel lumps Baltic and Slavic into the same category for mythological comparison and with my relative lack of familiarity with the differences between them, it is hard for me to pick apart the differences in his presentation.  His reasoning for this seems to be historical migration pattern where the Slavs migrated through the Balts territory all the way to Greece and became “Europeanized” in the sixth century while still having roots in what later became Bohemia (Puhvel 229).  Regardless, there is no primary source material because neither group were literate before the coming of Christianity (eighth century for the Slavs and not until the early fifteenth century in Lithuania), instead embracing an oral tradition much like the Gaulish Celts.  It was through Orthodox Christianity that writing came to the area, and then what writing was done about local religious tradition was done from the perspective of horror at the practices being done by the pagan peasantry, the opposite of an attempt to preserve the traditions.  What this means is that we have no clean copies of the myths or even the pantheons of the Balts or Slavs, but instead stories of demon-worship, snake handling, and goat sacrifice that we are left trying to untangle.   What we do have are folktales in the form of songs, many Christianized, that give us glimpses of the rich pagan practice we know lived on in the region (Puhvel 228).

2)     Summarize, then compare and contrast the myths of at least two Indo-European cultures with respect to the following topics (you need not use the same two cultures as a basis of comparison for each topic): (minimum 300 words for each)

tales of creation


Norse creation myth has two parts, as told in the Eddic poem Voluspa.  First, there is a pre-scientific version of the Big Bang Theory, where the fires of Muspelheim flow into the empty void of Ginnungagap, where they meet with the rime from Niflheim leading to an explosion and the formation of ice.   Next Audumla licked the salty ice and freed Ymir from its depths.  Ymir was a hermaphrodite and his body spawned progeny, who gave birth to Odin and his brothers Vili and Ve.  Eventually, the three brothers killed Ymir and dismembered his body, using the various parts to create the world (Sturluson).
Greek myth also begins with nothing, although they call it Chaos.  Out of Chaos appeared Erebus and Nyx.  Next emerged Eros, who brought about the beginnings of order in the form of Light.  Gaea followed Light and gave birth to the Uranus, the sky, who became her husband and with him she began to give birth to various parts of the world (Hesiod).
Both of these cultural myths describe the beginning of the world coming out of nothingness and chaos and show the role of the gods (at least one god in each case) in ordering the chaos.  Erebus, like Ymir, were born from the things happening in the chaos and had a role in producing the gods that would eventually bring order to the chaos.
There are many differences, though.  Where the Norse dismember the first being to create the various parts of the world, the Greeks have divine procreation to create them.   The Greeks personify the earth in Gaea directly in their myth; but while there is a Norse concept of earth goddesses, such as Jord and Hertha, none of the surviving Norse myths directly equate them or any other goddess to the entire planet Earth even though the name Hertha is a cognate for Earth. 
The Greeks have two other creation myths as well.  The first comes from Homer.  He refers to Okeanos as ‘the origin of the gods’.  Okeanos was a river-god whose river flowed around the perimeter of the world, and according to Homer, everything flowed out from his river.  His river was circular, and flowed back into itself.  When Zeus defeated Kronos, he allowed Okeanos to remain in place.  Associated with Okeanos is Tethys, his lover.  In The Gods of the Greeks, Kerenyi points out that a male stream alone is infertile, and so Tethys was the original mother who gave birth, and her children with Okeanos were what was carried out in his river.  Homer gave the couple’s quarrels as the reason creation stopped, but that this is a good thing because if they had not stopped, the world would have no stability.  Kerenyi also believes that this tale predates the Greeks in the area.  Even if that is that case, and this myth is part of the substrata of the Greek lands, the idea of the boundary waters supports the idea of the Waters of Life and the circular notion of giving and getting that we embrace in ADF.
Kerenyi also discusses the last of the Greek creation myths as passed down by the disciples of Orpheus.  According to this story, in the beginning was Night who had the form of a bird with black wings.  Night conceived with the Wind and laid a silver egg in the lap of Darkness.  From the egg emerged Eros, the god of love with golden wings.  With his light he revealed everything else which had been hidden in the silver egg, which was the entire world.  Above was the Sky, below was the Rest.  In another version, the earth laid in the bottom of the egg and she married the sky, which was the work of Eros who brought them together in love.  The two produced two children, Okeanos and Tethys (Kerenyi).  Neither of these last two myths have much resonance with the myths of the Norse beyond the concept of the boundary waters. 

tales of divine war


Norse myth has two Divine Wars.  The first, which comes early in the myth cycle, was fought between two ‘tribes’ of Gods, the Aesir and the Vanir.  The second, which is the close of the cycle, is fought between the Gods and the Giants who are primal forces intent on destroying the world. 
Surprisingly, given the cultural interest in the epic battles of heroes, there is no epic retelling of the battles of the war between the Aesir and Vanir itself.  In fact, we aren’t entirely sure what caused the war, although most commonly it is believed to have started with the burning of Gullveig by the Aesir (Lindow).  Regardless of how it started, the telling of the war story is contained in one stanza of Voluspa where the dead seeress tells how the Vanir were ‘trampling the plain’ and ‘breaking the wall of the Aesir’s stronghold’ until Odin hurled a spear over the field, which broke their advance (Orchard).  This first war ended with an exchange of hostages.  The Aesir sent Mimir and Hoenir to the Vanir in exchange for Njord and Kvasir.  Additionally, Njord brings his son and daughter, who are called Frey and Freya, with him.  One possibility for this story is that it tells of the gods of the Indo-European people besting the gods of those already in the area when they settled (Lindow).
Norse lore has a second divine war called Ragnarok, or the Doom of the Gods.  Also prophesied in Voluspa, although most of the details are recorded in Snorri’s Younger Edda, Ragnarok is the epic battle between the gods and the forces of Chaos.  In it, many of the gods die along with the enemies of Order, but once the world is destroyed, Baldr returns from the dead to begin the next cycle of life in a world now purified of these forces of Chaos (Sturluson).
The Greeks also have divine war between two ‘tribes’ of gods: the Olympians and the Titans.  The story, again from in Theogony, speaks of how the Titans were children of Gaea and Ouranos and came first.  They were ruled by Kronos who was married to Rhea, who gave birth to the Olympians.  Kronos ate his children because he was afraid of them becoming powerful enough to over throw him.  Zeus was saved from this fate by his mother, who substituted a rock and had him raised in secret.  When he was old enough, he poisoned his father into vomiting up his siblings who joined him in war to overthrow the Titans and rule the cosmos themselves. 
Though the lines were not clearly defined between the Titans and the Olympians, as several Titans sided with Zeus, this story is about regime change, not unlike the story of the war between the Aesir and Vanir, with the more primal gods (the Vanir and the Titans) being replaced by the newer tribe. 

tales which describe the fate of the dead


               Both Norse and Greek lore have stories about the fate of the dead.  Both cultures believed that the dead went to a separate realm that existed beneath the world of men, although heroes in both cultures seemed to be able to win an exception to that fate.
               The Norse believed that the dead went to Helheim, or the home of the Goddess Hel.  Helheim is listed in Grimnismal (a saga of the Poetic Edda) as existing under one of the roots of the world tree (Orchard), which is fitting when we consider the relationship Germanic peoples had with their ancestors.  If the world tree connects the realms and acts as a gateway, then understanding that the dead are on another connected plain but still close to us makes sense.  In addition to Hel’s hall, there was another part of the realm, Niflhel or Misty Hel, where outcasts were sent.  It was said to be cold and misty, a place of never ending winter.  Snorri’s depiction of the afterlife seems to be one of the places he was most influenced by Christian teachings.  His rendering the realm of the dead as a land of horror is unique to the other surviving pieces of lore, and seems to be an attempt on his part to reconcile the lore with Christian teachings (Ellis-Davidson).  This idea that Hel is a place of torment is at odds with the fact that Baldr went to Helheim after he was killed by Loki’s trickery.  Baldr, who was considered the most handsome and best of the gods, universally loved, has the kenning Hel’s Companion.  In chapter five of Skaldskaparmal, Baldr’s brother Hermodr travels to Hel to ask the goddess to release Baldr, and he finds his brother seated at her table enjoying a feast.  This gives rise to the view most Germanic Pagans today have of Hel as the abode of our ancestors rather than a dreary place of suffering.
               There is a second possible ending for the dead in Norse lore.  According to Grimnismal, Freya receives half of the warriors slain in battle and Odin gets the other half.  Odin’s half become the Einherjar, who fight every day to the death, then rise again to feast and drink and do it all over.  They are his forces that fight with him at Ragnarok.  It is unclear what Freya does with her half of the battle dead.
               The Greeks also had the realm of their dead below the realm of mankind in their cosmology.  Their underworld was ruled by Hades, brother of Zeus and Olympian.  Like Hel, there are different parts of the Greek underworld.  Tartarus, where the Titans were imprisoned, is seen as the destination of those needing punishment in the afterlife whereas those who were deserving of reward went to the Elysium Fields (Hesiod).  A very special few mortals were either brought to Olympus by the gods, such as Hercules, or immortalized in the stars, such as Cassiopeia.
                 There is at least one story in both sets of lore that tell of someone trying to win back a soul from the underworld.  The Norse had the story of Baldr, where Hel would only allow him to leave on the condition that all of creation cried for him.  The Greeks had the story of Orpheus, who made his way into Hades and tried to bargain for the return of his wife, Eurydice.  He was given the chance to bring her back so long as he did not look at her until they reached the realm of men.  In both stories, the bargain was unfulfilled and the soul one who was greatly loved was kept in the underworld. 


3)  Explain how each of the following elements of ADF ritual does or does not resonate with elements of two different Indo-European cultures (you need not use the same two cultures as a basis of comparison for each element): (minimum 100 words for each)

Earth Mother

               The Greeks had a very clearly defined Earth Mother in the figure of Gaea.  Gaea was seen as the supporting earth and land, born out of Chaos and thus a Protogenos, or primal deity.  She was understood to be one of the aspects of creation, since she birthed the heavens, the Titans, and many of the other gods (Theoi)
               The Norse, on the other hand, did not have a concept of the Earth as the embodiment of a goddess.  While there were goddesses such as Jord whose names were cognate for Earth (Simek) none of them took on the role of the divine creator of life the way the way Gaea did for the Greeks.  Instead, the Norse saw the Earth as the dismembered parts of Ymir.  Because of this, the idea of honoring the Earth Mother does not really resonate with a Norse Hearth.  However, honoring the Earth itself does.
               In his work Germania, Tacitus makes mention of a specific fertility goddess worshipped among some of the northern tribes named Nerthus.  Nerthus is a somewhat problematic deity as she is not mentioned in any of the surviving Lore and there is some discussion as to whether her name is in fact a feminized version of Njord, a sea god, as Nerthus is what the feminized, Latinized version would have most likely been.  There is discussion as to whether she was Njord’s sister, or if there were implications of Njord changing genders among some tribe (Lindow).  However, as reported by Tacitus, Nerthus was a fertility goddess who was honored by a procession through the lands where her statue was covered in a cart drawn by oxen.  During the time of her feast, wars were anathema and no one was allowed to bear arms in her presence.  At the end of the procession, her statue was washed in her sacred lake by slaves, who were then drowned along with the oxen (Tacitus).  Tacitus in his work calls her the Earth Mother, however many heathens believe this to be his view of her role based on his own Latin culture and not a reflection of the views of the tribes he was describing.  Even so, many of us honor Her on Earth Day, and in my personal practice, my compost pile is her altar where I make offerings to enrich her future bounty.

Deities of Land

              
               Deities of the land are those who are in some way tied to the land and its fertility.  In that sense, there are deities in both the Greek and Norse pantheons who would qualify.
               Among the Greek deities, Demeter who is patron of Agriculture and is most closely tied to the wellbeing of mankind because of her role in providing sustenance.  She is seen as causing the seasons because of her grief over the abduction of her daughter, and a good harvest was dependent on her good will (Theoi).  However the Greeks also had deities that were tied to the land in the wild places.  Some examples of this would be Artemis the Huntress and Pan the god of Shepherds and Flocks.
               The Norse had similar sorts of deities to the Greeks.  Skadi the Huntress dwells in wild lands, taking game and enjoying outdoor pursuits much like Artemis.  Sif, the wife of Thor, was known for her wheat-gold hair and was a goddess of agriculture and the fields not unlike Demeter.  And Freyr was seen as a sexually potent god tied to the fertility of the land, much like Pan. 

Deities of Sea

               Both the Norse and the Greeks had sea deities as well.  Njord was seen as a wealthy god, likely because the Norse associated the sea with commerce and raiding which one of their main sources of wealth.  He was said to have the powers of calming the waves and lives in Noatun, which translates as Ship Yard.  The main Norse sea deity, though, is Ran, a goddess.  She has a net that she uses to capture and drown sailors, and she and her husband Aegir, have nine daughters who are the waves and collectively are Heimdal’s mother (Sturluson).
               The Greeks’ main sea deity was Poseidon.  Zeus and his brothers won the war against the Titans, they each took rule of a realm and Poseidon was given the sea.  He was offered prayers by sailors for safety since he was seen as controlling sea storms (Theoi)

Deities of Sky

               The Greeks considered Zeus the foremost of the Sky Deities, although since the Olympians dwelled on Olympus, they all technically dwelled in the upper realms of the cosmology.  Zeus was the King of Olympus and the wielder of the Thunderbolt which was made for him by the Cyclopes in their forges for his war against Cronos (Theoi).  He had powers over the storm and his name is a direct cognate to other sky deities in other pantheons (Serith)
               For the Norse, the function of the Proto-Indo-European Sky God Dyues Pter was split into two beings (Serith).  Thor was the Thunderer, but he was never the King of the Gods.  Tyr held that role before he was transferred at some unknown point to Odin.  Even so, Tyr retained some of the functions of sovereignty (as well as the name cognate to the PIE god) and his association with the North Star.   Thor, on the other hand, was seen as wielding Mjolnir, made by the dwarves and given him by Loki as compensation for cutting Thor’s wife’s hair.                

Outsiders

               The Norse had a very clear understanding of the Outdwellers in that they were the forces of Chaos that were in direct opposition to the gods who would one day take the field against the gods in Ragnarok.  They saw these beings in the long winter cold and named them Jotuns, or Ice Giants.  Thor was tasked with protecting Midgard, the realm of men, and Asgard, the abode of the gods, from the Jotuns.  That said, not all Jotuns were bad.  Many in fact married into the ‘tribe’ of the gods including Skadi who married Njord and Gerd who marries Frey.  Loki is an ice giant, and so, technically, is Odin.  Therefore, the concept of Outdwellers is less about blood, but more about affiliation for the Norse (Sturluson) (Lindow).
               The Greeks didn’t really have a group that was the Outsiders.  The closest would probably be the Titans because they had actively opposed the Olympian gods, however with the end of that war and the Titans defeat, they ceased to be an active threat to the Olympian rule.  There was no group that allied with Chaos in an attempt to bring about the end of the world in Greek myth, so this is a role that isn’t filled.       
              

Nature Spirits

               Norse religion tended to be highly focused on spirits of the land, or landvaettir.  This is because most Norse were farmers, no matter how much they may have raided.  While the gods were involved in international politics, the landvaettir were concerned with the local landscape and its health.  If crops were to do well, it was because of the blessings of the wights, and if they failed or the game fled, it was also because of the wights (Gundarsson).
               The Greeks took working with nature spirits a step further, creating in essence and entire pantheon of nature spirits defined by where they lived.  Nymphs, as these lesser goddesses were called, were further broken down by what sort of plant or location they inhabited.  For example, Dryads lived in trees, while Naiads lived in various sources of fresh water (Theoi).  The Satyrs were male nature spirits associated with fertility in the wilderness and the countryside (Theoi).

Ancestors

               The Greeks honored their ancestors, in fact the Greeks celebrated Genesios, a festival to honor the dead (Parke). Stories honoring their ancestors were shared and offerings made to them.  In several of the epics, heroes consult their dead ancestors for guidance such as when Odysseus goes to meet Tiresias (Homer).
               The ancestor were equally important to the Norse.  One of the folk beliefs seems to be that ancestors, especially male ancestors, died into the grave mound and became one with the land that they had worked, bled for, and sweated on (Gundarsson).  Female ancestors were honored especially on the first night of Yule, called Mother’s Night. 
4) Discuss how the following seven elements of ADF's cosmology are (or are not) reflected in the myths of two different Indo-European cultures. For this question, please use the same two cultures as a basis of comparison for the entire question. (minimum 100 words each)

Upperworld

               Both the Greeks and the Norse had an Upperworld, and in ADF we approach this upper world in prayer and devotionals that ask for the gods’ wisdom and guidance.
For the Greeks, this Upperworld was Mt. Olympus, the home of the Olympian gods.  Mt. Olympus was seen as being a connection between the gods and man, but one that men could (probably) not climb.  In the modern era, its highest peak was not climbed until 1913.  As the highest mountain in Greece and the second highest in the Balkans, Mt. Olympus is was a part of the earth that was inaccessible to man. That made it an ideal setting for the stories of the gods who came to Earth and interacted with man, then returned home to the sky.
The Norse divide the Upperworld into three realms.  Asgard is the home of the Aesir, Vanaheim, the home of the Vanir, and Alfheim, the land of the elves.  To reach Midgard, the gods travel across Bifrost, the rainbow bridge, which is guarded by Heimdall (Orchard).  Unlike the Greeks, the Norse did not have a real world location for where they imagined their gods dwelling place.

Middleworld


               The Middleworld for both the Greeks and the Norse was the land of men, the physical plain of existence.  In ADF we also consider it the land of the land spirits who inhabit our environment (both inside and outside).
               For the Norse, the Middleworld was again divided into three parts.  Midgard was the realm of men.  It was surrounded by the ocean that contained the world serpent, Jormungand, a child of Loki who was destined to fight Thor at Ragnarok.  There is some disagreement as to which of the rest of the realms are located in the Middleworld.  The Norse generally considered Niflheim, the realm of mists, to be located to the North, although some maps of Norse Cosmology place it in the Underworld.  Niflheim was located over Hel, and held the entrance to the land of the dead.  In the South was Muspelheim, the land of fire that was inhabited by Surt, who will lead the enemies of the Gods to Ragnarok.  Jotunheim was also on the level of Midgard and was the home of the Frost Giants who were the primary enemies of the gods (Orchard).
               The Greeks saw the Middleworld as encircled by water, too, although for them it was in the form of a river called Okeanos, not an ocean (Hesiod).  The Greek Middleworld was less defined than the Norse.  The saw the world as the embodiment of Gaea surrounded by her husband the Sky.  Because of this, there was some overlap between the concept of Upperworld and Middleworld since the gods lived in the Upperworld of the Heavens, but still below the dome of the sky.

Divisions Of Middleworld

              
As discussed in the previous section, the Norse divided the Middleworld into different parts.  Which parts are in the Middleworld vary slightly based on source.  Generally though, the Middleworld, consisted of Midgard, the realm of men, and then the realm of fire (Muspelheim) to the South and Niflheim or the land of mists to the North.  This played a role in the creation story, since the fire of Muspelheim and the misty rime from Niflheim flowed together into Ginnungagap to create building blocks of salt and ice for the beginning of the world and the ordering and filling of the void.  Some also include Jotunheim in the Middleworld, since the Giants were constantly threatening the world with destruction (Crossley-Holland).
The Greeks didn’t really divide their Middleworld.  Certainly not to the extent the Norse did.  All of the land was seen as part of Gaea, and was surrounded by the river Okeanos.  The sky was personified by Gaea’s son/husband Ouranos, and was a dome that completely covered the earth, touching her on all sides (Hesiod).  Because of this, we could potentially make the argument that the Greeks divided the Middleworld into Earth, Sea, and Sky, however that confuses the mapping issue of the entire cosmology.

Nether/Underworld


               The Underworld is the Land of the Dead.  In ADF, the Underworld is where we go to interact with the Ancestors.  The Norse and Greek underworlds have some interesting parallels, the most striking of which are that they are both guarded by a dog (Garm for the Norse, Cerberus for the Greeks) and the entrance for both is said to lie in the North.
In Norse mythology the Underworld is again divided into parts.  The first of these divisions is Hel, the land of the dead which lies directly below Niflheim.  Hel is the final destination for most people, named for the Goddess who rules the land of the dead.  Snorri describes it in fairly morbid terms, but most scholars agree with Ellis-Davidson’s points that this was due to Christian influences (Ellis-Davidson).  There is a special section of Hel called Niflhel that is reserved for evildoers.   Also part of the Underworld is Svartalfheim, the land of the dwarves, properly translated as Dark Elves.  Some sources place also place Niflheim in the Underworld, but as discussed in the section on the Middleworld, the cosmology makes more sense if that is part of the Middleworld.
The Greek underworld is ruled by Hades.  During part of the year, he is joined by Persephone as his queen, which causes her mother Demeter distress and plummets the world into winter.  The Underworld is divided into Tartarus, a land of punishment, and the Elysium Fields where those who earned a pleasant afterlife are sent (Hesiod).      

Fire


In ADF we see Fire as a gate between the worlds.  Specifically, it is the flame that transforms our offerings into smoke that rises to the Upperworld where the gods dwell. 
Fire was as important to the Greeks as it is to ADF.  Again, it was the way that sacrifices were transformed and carried to the gods, especially the smoke from animal sacrifices.  Fire was sacred to Hestia, who was the goddess of the hearth, tending the fires in the hearth on Mt. Olympus.  Because she was the goddess of the sacrificial flame, she received a part of every sacrifice to the gods (Theoi).  Fire was given to Man by one of the Titans, Prometheus, who stole the flame from Olympus (Theoi)
The Norse used fire slightly differently.  Though they burned sacrifices, there were other ways of setting apart the Gods’ portion than just burning it.  Still, some sacrifices were burned among the Norse.  One of the main uses for fire in a ceremonial context was in funeral rites.  The gods themselves built a pyre for Baldr when he was killed (Orchard), and one of the few surviving texts describing the eyewitness account of Ibn Fadlan (Sessrumnir Kindred) of a funeral for a Northman gives details about the arrangement of man, goods, and slaves to be burned to send him on his journey to the next world 

Well


               In ADF, we see the well as the gateway to the realms of the ancestors.  This is a concept that resonates very clearly with the Norse.  The Norse had three wells in their Lore, each located under one of the roots of the world tree Yggdrassil.  The first is the well of Mimir, or memory.  This is the well that Odin sacrifices an eye to in order to gain knowledge.  The second well is the well of Urd, or Wyrd.  This is the well where the Norns gather.  They use the water of the well of wyrd to water the world tree.  In doing so, they use the wyrd of those who have gone before to nurture the tree, which in turn drops its leaves and fruit into the well showing the interconnection of not just life, but all of our actions in the great cycle.  The final well is the Hvergelmir.  This is the well that is the headwaters for the eleven rivers that make up the Elgavir.  Additionally, this is where Nidhogg, the serpent that causes distress to the world tree, lives (Orchard).
The Greeks didn’t have a well as such, however they did have a similar relationship with water.  Okeanos was the river that surrounded the land (Hesiod), and all of the other rivers got their water from it, not unlike the way the Norse saw Hvergelmir.  In Greek myth, the underworld is reached by way of the River Styx, so the concept of traveling through underground waters to reach the realm of the dead is also consistent.  The River Styx becomes the gate by which the Ancestors are reached, and offerings to the well, in the form of the coin needed to pay the ferryman Charon could be seen as the offerings made to the dead.

Tree


               ADF uses the Tree as the connection between the realms, or the axis mundi, allowing us to reach all of the realms in ritual.  This is very clearly aligned with Norse cosmology in which Yggdrassil, the world tree, holds each of the realms in its being.  Further, it plays a central role as the structure of the universe.  The Lore tells that it grows brittle unless it is watered by the Norns at the Well of Wyrd and covered with clay to protect it from the serpent of chaos that gnaws at its roots (Orchard).  It shows the balance between Chaos and Cosmos that was inherent in the Indo-European view of the cosmos (Newberg).
The Greeks did not have the concept of the world tree, and the tree as the structure of the universe does not resonate with Greek myth.  What they did have was the Omphalos, or the navel of the world. It was created by Zeus, who sent two eagles to fly in opposite directions around the world.  Where they met was said to be the center (Newberg).  Zeus placed the Omphalos there.  The Omphalos was the stone that Cronos was given to swallow instead of the baby Zeus.   The Omphalos is at Delphi, which became the home of the Oracle of Delphi because this center of the world was considered to be a place where communication between the gods and man could occur (Jones).

5)     To what extent do you think we can offer conjectures about Indo-European myths in general? Are the common themes strong enough that the myths seem like variations? Or are the differences so powerful that the themes are less important than the cultural variations? (minimum 300 words)

For the purpose of these exit standards, I have focused on only two cultures’ myths: the Greeks and the Norse.  Even in only comparing the two, I found that there were surprising numbers of similarities between the myths of the two cultures.  Many more than I had initially expected.  I think that’s because when I am reading the myths as literature or even as inspiration for ritual, I get caught in the cultural specifics, not in the universal themes beneath them.  I don’t know that I would go so far as to say that they seem like variations, but rather that there are themes that have survived through time in each culture. 
For example, the idea of the world tree is one of the primary parts of Norse lore but non-existent in the Greek.  Looking at it on the surface, this would seem as if it wasn’t a universal theme in IE myth at all.  However, if we take a step back from the concrete idea of a Tree, and instead look at the idea of a physical center to the cosmos, then we find an idea that is easier to align throughout the IE mythologies.  Another example of this is the idea of the Earth Mother.  While the Slavic pantheon has kept even the name the Moist Earth Mother and held onto a fierce veneration of Her, the concept is lacking entirely from the Norse and the Greeks have an incarnate Earth, but don’t necessarily venerate and sacrifice to her. 
The approach that we take in these situations says a lot about ADF as a pan-IE organization.  Accepting that not everything will fit perfectly, and giving us the ability to make adjustments to our rite and rituals allows us the flexibility to embrace the parts of the core order that mesh well, and make allowances for the parts that don’t. 
That said, there is a lot that can be learned from the differences.  They can tell us things about when cultural differences emerged in the course of the Indo-European migration out of the homeland.  They can give us clues as to where the homeland even was.  They can tell us things about the original culture, based on where the differences occur. 
Taking this comparative view gives a certain depth that straight reconstruction can lack.  An instance of this for me was in discussing the Moon.  The difference between why the Germanic peoples see the moon as male while the Greeks and Romans see the moon as female always baffled me.  Somehow, the difference explanation of the sun in hot climates was brutal where as it was seen as nurturing in northern colder climates never made sense.  But talking about a Mediterranean substrate of culture that likely influenced the change from male to female makes perfect sense (Puhvel).
There are two final points about this I wish to add.  The first is the cliché that the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.  Particularly for the Indo-European cultures that were pre-literate, it is important to remember that some things were sadly lost.  That does not mean they never existed.  This isn’t an excuse to do random things, rather it is a way to ground a recreation of what was lost.  If neighboring Indo-European cultures had something that there is no evidence for, it stands to reason that something could be approximated for it to fill the gap.
Similarly, when we have evidence for obvious post-pagan changes, such as the way Snorri discusses the realms of the dead, having proximate cultures to draw material from allows us to try and weed out some of the encroachment and get closer to what our ancestors likely actually believed.  While this has to be done very, very carefully, comparative analysis is a useful tool.
        Overall, I feel that the similarities outweigh the differences.  There is clear evidence for a broader basis than the culturally specific myths that we have to draw on.  Cross cultural analysis is a useful tool so long as we don’t take it too far and instead wipe out the differences that give life to the stories.




Works Cited

Codex Regius no. 2365. n.d. 25 December 2014. <http://www.germanicmythology.com/works/CODEXREGIUS.html>.
Crossley-Holland, Kevin. The Norse Myths. Pantheon, 1981.
Ellis-Davidson, Hilda Roderick. The Road to Hel: A Study of the Conception of the Dead in Old Norse Literature. Praeger, 1968. Ebook.
Gundarsson, Kveldulf. Elves, Wights, and Trolls: Studies Towards the Practice of Germanic Heathenry: Vol. I (v. 1) . iUniverse, Inc., 2007.
Hesiod. Theogony. Ed. H G Evelyn-White. n.d. website. 24 February 2015. <http://www.theoi.com/Text/HesiodTheogony.html>.
Homer. The Oddesy. Trans. A T. Murray. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1919. ebook. <http://www.theoi.com/Text/HomerOdyssey1.html>.
Jones, Prudence and Nigel Pennick. A History of Pagan Europe. London: Routledge, 1997.
Lindow, John. Norse Mythology: A Guide to the Gods, Heroes, Rituals, and Beliefs. Oxford University Press, 2001. ebook.
Newberg, B. Step Five: (Re)Creating the Cosmos. . n.d. Website. 12 October 2014.
Orchard, Andy. The Elder Edda (Legends from the Ancient North). Penguin Classics, 2013. Kindle.
Parke, H.W. Festivals of the Athenians. Cornell, 1977.
Puhvel, Jaan. Comparative Mythology. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987. Book.
Serith, Ceisiwr. "Deep Ancestors: Practicing the Religion of the Proto-Indo-Europeans." ADF Publishing, 2014. Kindle.
Sessrumnir Kindred. The Risala of Ibn Fadlan. n.d. 24 February 2015. <http://web.archive.org/web/20080409203620/http://www.geocities.com/sessrumnirkindred/risala.html>.
Simek, Rudolf. A Dictionary of Northern Mythology. Trans. Angela Hall. BOYE6, 2008.
Stewart, Michael. Origins of Greek Mythology. 26 June 2009. Web. 25 December 2014. <http://messagenetcommresearch.com/myths/essays/origins.html>.
Sturluson, Snorri. Edda. Trans. Anthony Faulks. Everyman Publishing, 1987. Kindle.
Tacitus. Germania. Acheron Press, 2012. Kindle.
Theoi. Demeter. n.d. 14 February 2015. <http://www.theoi.com/Olympios/Demeter.html>.
—. Gaia. n.d. Website. 24 February 2015. <http://www.theoi.com/Protogenos/Gaia.html>.
—. Hestia. n.d. 24 February 2015. <http://www.theoi.com/Ouranios/Hestia.html>.
—. Nymphai. n.d. 21 February 2015. <http://www.theoi.com/Cat_Nymphai.html>.
—. Poseidon. n.d. 22 February 2015. <http://www.theoi.com/Olympios/Poseidon.html>.
—. Prometheus. n.d. 24 February 2015. <http://www.theoi.com/Titan/TitanPrometheus.html>.
—. Satyrs. n.d. 21 February 2015. <http://www.theoi.com/Georgikos/Satyroi.html>.
—. Zeus. n.d. 22 February 2015. <http://www.theoi.com/Olympios/Zeus.html>.




No comments:

Post a Comment